5.01.2009

Outsourcing: The Upside of the Out-House

Times, as you know, are tight. It seems as though everybody, with the exception of the federal government, is tightening belts almost the point of busting our collective gut. So what options do we have to reduce costs at work? One of the most obvious: Outsource what we can to save money while keeping our level of service intact. Let’s look at a big negative and a couple of positives.

One of the major downsides, if not THE downside of outsourcing is a perception of loss of control. This perception, or reality, is usually due to lack of face to face communication. This can be overcome, but does take more effort than having employees you can always call for a quick meeting. The beauty here is that the tools available for communication over the Internet are vast and powerful. From Apple’s iChat (http://apple.com), that allows very easy audio-video conferences and screen-sharing, to Skype (http://skype.com/) that allows you to talk PC-PC (or Mac) anywhere in the world. Another tool: Gotomeeting (http://gotomeeting.com) is designed for online meetings. Gotomeeting costs are affordable and tools for collaboration are outstanding. If you don't need Microsoft Office live collaboration, a free tool, veyw (http://vyew.com/site/index2) is great for meetings. These tools (and many more) are free or very inexpensive and should (must) be utilized to both audibly and visually communicate with your team. In short, we have no excuse for poor communication, whether our team members are at our conference table or 3,000 miles away …on a beach …enjoying a tropical breeze (we really hate those guys...)

When using these tools, plan for time differences and work backward from your project deadline to establish set times for communicating with your team. Schedule this time and create a calendar event using Outlook, Google Calendar (http://calendar.google.com) or other software everyone on your team can access and utilize. To ensure your team members are on the same page, create an agenda for your meetings and share it with the team at least a day before. An agenda will go a long way in making your communication succinct, accurate, and cause a minimum of confusion. Include an action plan on the agenda with names and tasks assigned. This action plan can change during the meeting based on the discussion, but it’s great to have a starting point, an expectation of what you see coming out of the meeting. (Lisa B. Marshall gives some very good tips for effective meetings in Episode 40 of her Podcast here: The Public Speakers Quick and Dirty Tips website)

The BIG upside of outsourcing is an immediate reduction of personnel cost. Savings come from the reduction of monthly salaries and benefits, the indirect costs of office space, parking, electricity, computers, etc... In contrast, companies who contract with you bring their own tools to the playing field, work from their own offices, own or lease their computers, pay for their phones and internet, and buy their own health insurance. Heck! These guys even train themselves! And they do this so that they can serve you, their client, in the best way possible.

Budget control is another benefit of outsourcing. Working closely with a company with which you contract allows you to establish scope of work and the costs for that work. Those costs are static until you change the scope, up or down. Setup a quarterly review process with the company or companies to monitor next quarter's needs, quality of work, and to see if the company can provide other services to you. Based on these meetings, adjust your scope accordingly. Remember, as in any relationship, communication is vital.

This mercury-like market we’re in creates a need to ramp up and then down very quickly, sometimes overnight. Some weeks are incredibly busy with deadlines that threaten our sanity, and then some are so slow as to be almost hypnotic in their boredom. Create a list of companies and individuals you trust to work with you on your projects. Then keep that list updated and always be on the look-out for partnerships that will give you and your company the winning edge over your competition. Start now.

Allen

4.14.2009

Advantages of Using Virtual Product Shots

Whether you are watching TV, reading a magazine, or driving by a billboard on the Highway, marketing advertisements are everywhere. Recently, Jason Lee and I have been creating 3D product shots to add to Paradigms portfolio and have noticed numerous reasons why utilizing 3D has a competitive advantage.

Most of the ads we see on a day to day basis have some form of 3D integrated into them. For instance, ads in magazines are full of product shots that were created on the computer and printed for the end user to view. For example, a recent mock ad Jason produced dealt with a cologne bottle emerged underwater and bubbles rising to the surface. Imagine how difficult, if possible, it would have been to generate this in a real world setup.

A major reason for creating ads in 3D is to have control. Having the control to design an ad and to be able to change that ad if needed in a timely manner is key. Not only can it be done quickly but also saves money in the long run. A product photography shoot can be very expensive to plan, direct, and manage whereas you can obtain a photo real result straight from the computer and there is not a loss of control over the outcome you expect.

The accuracy that comes out of virtual product shots can be managed more effectively. A product can be created, designed, and modified in 3D space whereas once you have the video footage; that is all you have to work with. What if you need to add a shot or need a different background? What if the look of the product did not turn out how you imagined? Many obstacles are taken out the way when going the virtual route.

You can bring an object to life or stylize a product to match how it is portrayed to the audience. This is easily obtained in 3D rather than with real world environments. Utilizing virtual lighting, animations, and modeling helps create an edge over other ads and can aid in selling an idea faster. Remember, anything is possible in a virtual world!

Jana

3.25.2009

Paradigm March Madness

It is that time of year again when we fill out our brackets to see who will win the Men’s 2009 NCAA Championship. Paradigm has a “bracket wall” (no, not a bunch of brackets to hold something) in our office and we follow the games each week to see who will come out on top and claim bragging rights. Every year Jason thinks he will be triumphant but tends to be all talk and no follow through...ouch!

This year the office is split between North Carolina and our hometown Memphis Tigers to win it all - and one who thinks Louisville will take home the trophy (whatever!). The first two rounds have been played as we enter the Sweet 16 with a three way tie in points. The standings show Mike, Laurabeth, and Jana are on top with 52 points and are closely being trailed by Brian “The Awesome” Yonker with 50 points. Last year Ted "I don't like college football" was the winner by one point and hopes to make it a repeat.

A lot of trash talking has been occurring this week around the office and it is still anyone’s game as the Sweet 16 starts up on Thursday March 26. Stay tuned to the standings as more teams are weeded out and see who will end up the 2009 Paradigm March Madness Champion.

Jana

1.25.2009

ADDY Awards - the aftermath

I had the pleasure of judging the ADDY Awards in Destin, Fl this past weekend - I love an excuse to eat seafood!

The award judging process took all day on Saturday, but it was so well organized that it was easy on us. Will Maberry, director of marketing, at Destin Properties had everything ready to go and was a very helpful host. Jessica Maraman of Vivid Publicity & Marketing was responsible for asking me to judge.

The process revealed several interesting things that I had suspected before. First of all, it was clear that many companies do not enter their work. Paradigm has worked for several years in Florida and many of the ads, brochures, etc. that I have seen in the area were clearly absent. Secondly, it confirmed my belief that this really ends up being a “beauty show” more than dicerning the most effective piece.

Because there are so many entries and no context is provided for the work, the judges will tend to score entries higher that stand apart visually from the others. Unfortunately, a higher score doesn’t mean the submittal is the most effective collateral pieces to the particular end user or client. Never-the-less it does also remind one that being unique does capture attention.

So at the end of the day I concluded that ideally the award process would allow the judge to not only visually respond to the submital, but to also understand the target audience and success - I would like to see a case study with each.

Lastly - there are way too many categories. It is confusing for the submitter and just plain silly at times. Note to national ADDYs - delete redundant categories - and/or create clear definitions.

I hope I have the chance to do this again soon and it would be so much better if some tweaks were made.